March 13th, 2009
In light of the recent response by Attorney Amin Aminfar of the US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Special Litigations Office, I ask that anyone with any information, especially witnesses of any crimes committed in any Arizona correctional facility including the private prisons come forward and report.
Should you fear retaliation, I will understand. Look what they have done to me!
Nonetheless, you have the address and the name of the Trial Attorney who will bring this to court and press for justice. You also may contact me and I will help you in any way I can.
The crimes which I reported include:
Rape of an inmate
Sex with a patient
Fraud
Malfeasance
Medical Neglect
Manslaughter
-And –
MURDER!
All in the plural.
Meaning many crimes have been systematically covered up thanks in a large part to Dora Schriro
and
her lover and literally “partner in crime”
Janet Napolitano!
Tags: ADOC, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Arizona Governor Napolitano, crime, Democrat, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, duty to report, FBI, fraud, Janet Napolitano, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, murder, nepotism, political, psychiatry, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, Psychosociopolitical Warfare, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Susan Arnold, United States of America, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, Anne Middaugh, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Democratic Party, Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security, Jeffrey Golde, John Trezise, Susan Arnold, US Department of Justice | No Comments »
March 13th, 2009
I received this letter in the mail yesterday. This is not the response to the letter I wrote DOJ but materials forwarded apparently last summer from the Arizona District of the US Attorney’s Office. Indeed, I am eager to see the Department of Justice response to the letter I wrote them. actually, I may have received that. I’ll have to look around and see if I have that.
IF YOU KNOW OF ANYTHING THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE TO THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO SEE JUSTICE REGARDING ABUSES WITHIN The Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC), NOW WOULD BE A GOOD TIME TO COME FORWARD and do your civic and moral duty.
Here is the accurate pdf of the converted & scanned letter below. Remember: The pdf file is more accurate and some formatting is lost in conversion but this cut and paste Word Doc allows for more open searching.
20090309-0011
|
|
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division
|
|
SYC:DHW:AA:PC:db DJ 168-68-0
|
Special Litigation Section – PHB 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530
|
March 9, 2009
John Taylor Kent, Ph.D. 933 West Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248-3811
Dear Dr. Kent:
The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona has referred your letter of August 15, 2008, to us for a reply. In your letter and accompanying documents you allege that the Arizona Department of Corrections has engaged in corrupt personnel practices and improper medical practices.
Under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997, the Special Litigation Section of the United States Department of Justice has authority to investigate conditions in state or locally-operated correctional facilities where it is alleged that inmates are being deprived of constitutional rights pursuant to a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of those rights. We will consider the information you have provided, along with other information we may receive, to determine whether a pattern or practice investigation is warranted.
The Section’s authority does not, however, extend to investigating the personal grievances of a single individual. Moreover, the Section is not authorized to represent individual citizens in legal matters or to give them legal advice. You might consider contacting a private legal representative for possible assistance with your individual concerns.
Thank you for bringing this information to our attention. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if we may be of assistance with this, or any other matter.
Sincerely,
Amin Aminfar
Trial Attorney
Special Litigation Section
Tags: ADOC, Arizona Department of Corrections, civic duty, Civil Rights Division, Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons act, correctional facilities, crime, CRIPA, Democrat, deprived of constitutional rights, District of Arizona, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, duty to report, FBI, fraud, inmates, investigation, Janet Napolitano, liberal, liberals, locally-operated correctional facilities, malfeasance, malpractise, moral duty, murder, pattern of resistance, political, practise of resistance, psychiatry, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, Psychosociopolitical Warfare, Republican, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Special Litigation Section, state correctional facilities, Susan Arnold, United State's Attonery's Office, United States of America, Unprofessional Conduct, US Department of Justice
Posted in ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Constitution, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Democratic Party, Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security, Psychosociopolitical Warfare, US Department of Justice | No Comments »
March 6th, 2009
Says Hillary Rodham Clinton in Brussels.
Does this coming from the Secretary of State make it official?
Change through crisis.
Change forced by the wanton destruction of everything that has been accomplished over decades of hard work.
Obama is going to shove through the “change” he wants by wrecking our economy, wrecking our savings, wrecking our retirements, wrecking & destroying it all?
Maybe.
Why?
Because we are going to let him get away with it!
WAKE UP, AMERICA!
Tags: change, character, crisis, crisis change, Democrat, economy, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, liberal, liberals, malpractise, New World Order, Obama, political, Psychosociopolitical Warfare, secretary of state, United States of America, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in Constitution, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Democratic Party, New World Order, Obama | No Comments »
March 6th, 2009
Said Rahm Emanuel last Novermber right after the election.
Might this be the Motto of the Obama Administration?
Change through crisis.
Might this be “the method” the Obama Presidency utilizes to effect “change?”
Tags: change, crisis, crisis change, Democrat, economy, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, method, motto, New World Order, Obama, Rahm Emanuel, United States of America
Posted in Corruption of Elected Public Officials, New World Order, Obama | No Comments »
March 6th, 2009
http://drkentshow.com/wordpress/wp-admin/edit.php
Gee, I don’t know how to take Financial Times co-editor Gillian Tett’s Column today (March 6). For one, Tett knows from my email to her that I am a fan of hers. And she is quite right. What else is new? This blond’s got brains!
In describing the “cognitive fog” that pervades almost everything financial; however, I believe she’s misused the term “cognitive” slightly. A far more apropos term would be “confusion.”
These are confusing times and it is only going to get worse. Obama is going to make good on every one of his campaign promises irregardless of the effects on anyone. Obama is focused on making history by uniting the entire globe under one rule. Obama is intent upon ushering in The New World Order.
However, this is not to say “psychology” has had nothing to do with it. In fact, one could claim the entire battle has been fought “psychologically” and I don’t think anyone could deny that. Except, we are fighting on all fronts and, what’s more, WE DON’T EVEN REALIZE IT!
In the future I will scan en toto an article that purports to be written in 1936 describing psychosociopolitcal warfare.
Here is my call:
There shall be no relief until some remnant of the United States of America breaks off from the rest and declares Constitutional Law. With that return to the original instrument under which this country flourished, we may regain our standing and get beyond this confusion. It is confusion by design, perhaps even grand design.
This is our opportunity to do away with “the beast,” the “creature” called the Federal Reserve and return to a Constitutional currency with which stability may be achieved once again.
Otherwise, Obama and his ilk will take us back through time and regress civilization to the point of even more disaster. Rahm Emmanuel said that these tough times are good and will permit the “Demoncrat” Party to usher in their broad reaching policy and bring about the new World Wide Communistic Order.
Why fight battles as before when you can run a Trojan horse (or a Kenyan) and place him in the White House to do your bidding?
Tags: economy, New World Order, Obama, political, psychology, United States of America
Posted in Democratic Party, Federal Reserve, New World Order, Obama | 2 Comments »
March 6th, 2009
This is the question and I do NOT have the answer!
Sandra Bolf seemed like a nice person.
Did she become ill?
Why did she leave the Board of Arizona Psychologst Examiners?
Could someone please tell me?
Ms. Bolf if you are out there & aware of my blog, cold you tell us what happened?
Are you OK?
Tags: Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Bolf, character, Executive Director Sandra Bolf, political, Psychologist, psychologists, psychology, Sandra Bolf
Posted in Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses | No Comments »
March 6th, 2009
rfi08-07silbermannotice-001
While I really do not like having to post this publically about Al Silberman, the story really would be incomplete without it. Dr. Silberman is a moral and ethical psychologist and should not be cast in with the lot. And Al is likeable. However, Silberman’s contributions were significant.
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. -08-07
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding Adolph Silberman, Ed.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-07 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018. Sincerely,
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Rev 1/08
Tags: Adolf, Al Silberman, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Democrat, liberal, liberals, malpractise, political, Psychologist, psychologists, psychology, Silberman, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in Al Silberman, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses | 7 Comments »
March 6th, 2009
rfi08-08arnoldnotice-001
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
State of Arizona
Board of Psychologist Examiners
1400 West Washington, Suite 235
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phone: (602) 542-8162 Fax: (602) 542-8279
‘N,“ psychboard.az.gov in fc*psychboard.az.gov
Staff
Sonja M. Bolf Executive Director
Meghan Hinckley Deputy Director
Victoria Kamm, CI Investigator
Steve Schroeder Administrative Assistant
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. 08-08
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding Susanne Arnold, Ph.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-08 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018. Sincerely,
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Rev 1 /08
Tags: Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Dr. Arnold, fraud, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, murder, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Susan Arnold
Posted in Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Psychologist, Susan Arnold | No Comments »
March 6th, 2009
rfi08-04trezisenotice-0011
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. 08-04
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding John Trezise, Ph.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-04 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018.
Sincere
, A
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Tags: ADOC, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Dr. John Trezise, John Trezise, political, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Trezise, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in John Trezise, Psychologist, RFI No. 08-04 | 1 Comment »
March 6th, 2009
. . . please allow me to begin introducing evidence. Nonetheless, there is a critical communication from McCarthy which I intend to introduce regarding the former Executive Director’s opinion (and hence the Board’s opinion). That communication establishes the basis for revealing what would otherwise be considered “privileged communications.” Thereafter, I will provide more evidence that will convince the reader of a conspiracy to harm me using the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners.
Tags: Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, crime, Executive Director, malfeasance, Maxine McCarthy, Mrs. Maxine McCarthy, Psychologist, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses | No Comments »