Archive for the ‘United States Supreme Court’ Category
In my opinion, President Obama’s recent Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian.
Likewise, Secretary of Homeland Security and former Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano is most definitely a practicing lesbian who is in a long-term relationship with her former cabinet level appointee, the former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections Dora Schriro. However, Schriro may be bi-sexual.
But, not Elena Kagan. After all my years of experience as a psychologist (retired due to the harassment of Napolitano’s hacks on the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners) in my opinion Kagan is a pure lesbian.
Far more importantly, in my opinion, Elena Kagan is NOT qualified to be appointed to the United States Supreme Court! In fact, I do not think Kagan should be a judge in ANY court. However, I would not be averse to some jurisdiction appointing Ms. Kagan to preside over some Small Claims Court occasionally on a substitute basis so that Ms. Elena Kagan, Esquire might get relevant experience and so that we might see how she might perform.
Being a lesbian, in my opinion, does not necessarily disqualify a woman from being in public service; nonetheless, failing to acknowledge one’s sexuality IS a reason to disqualify a woman from public office, especially when that woman appoints her lesbian lover to a sensitive position underneath her such as a cabinet level appointee. That would be evidence of boundary issues and very poor judgement.
Should the REPUBLICAN SENATORS FAIL TO FILIBUSTER AND DENY PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SECOND SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, that will be evidence that there is no Republican Party and the situation for our country is HOPELESS.
Think of the working environment that would create to appoint this unqualified person to the United States Supreme Court: It would be a nightmare for the truly qualified justices and we may lose them due to the hostile environment Kagan would push upon them! We need to make sure that only well-qualified judges with experience are appointed to the Supreme Court least we risk alienating those Honorable Justices already serving!
Furthermore, it is in President Obama’s best interest* that this unqualified liberal who has already demonstrated her willingness to wrongly use her position to push her radial political agenda is not confirmed by the US Senate. Kagan did it at Harvard and she will do it on the Supreme Court if she is appointed.
The best judge of future behavior is past behavior.
If we had a Constitutional Legislature, this would not happen. In fact, had our Senate the structure originally written by our founders, it would never happen. In my opinion, the Seventeenth Amendment is unconstitutional and would not survive a Supreme Court challenge. It would be thrown out!
Any sitting REPUBLICAN SENATOR who fails to take an active role in the filibuster to block Kagan’s appointment needs to be recalled and needs to be unseated by any means at the earliest opportunity–especially those up for re-election this year 2010 and thereafter.
*Obama is too narcissistic to realize this. But, then, Stalin-like sociopathy overrules everything about the man.
Sonia Sotomayor is a Hate-Filled Racist Monger & Sotomayor’s Ascent Proves the Two Party System is a FarceSunday, July 19th, 2009
If it weren’t for the racist practices of so-called Affirmative Action paving her way, Sotomayor would never make it. She could never make it on her own.
Ask any “liberal” and s/he’ll tell you:
“Those people need our help because they can’t make it on their own.”
Sotomayor is the epitome of liberalism in practice in America: Only here could some one so vastly unintelligent, so mediocre get into law school and be accepted into any bar association. And she has become a judge!
Sotomayor is am embarrassment to attorneys, an embarrassment to the legal profession.
But look at the Republicans swoon over her!
The Republicans “love” Sotomayor proving:
There is NO TWO PARTY System in America.
The TWO PARTY SYSTEM is dead.
There is no difference, not an iota of difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. Both are taking us down the highway to hell.
President George Washington in writing warned us long ago about the evils inherent in the party’s system.
Sotomayor’s presentation during the Senate confirmation hearings shows us what we are getting:
An “over controlled” woman filled with hate.
Sotomayor is filled with hatred.
She neither respects the law nor justice.
Rather than find the guilty party guilty, Sotomayor always seeks to “split the baby.”
Even Solomon knew that dividing the infant would mean its death. That’s why he awarded the child to the prostitute who pleaded for the child’s life. Only she would act properly as a mother defending her child in any way—even it if meant giving her child up.
Affirm this mediocre excuse for a legal mind and you’ll be giving America away, and life in America will never be the same. Many will not survive this regime, the Obama dictatorship.
Based upon Sonia Sotomayor’s presentation and the vocabulary Sotomayor has employed thus far in this public debacle that attempts to pass for a “Senate Confirmation Hearing,” Sotomayor could not break 110 on her Full Scale Intellectual Quotient.
This should strike fear into the heart of the American citizenry. We are likely for an extremely rough ride with Sotomayor in a lifetime appointment on the United States Supreme Court.
If Sotomayor is so dumb, how did she become an attorney much less a judge in any court?
How did Sotomayor get where she is?
Sotomayor is an “affirmative action baby.”
Sonia is an Affirmative Action Baby.
Based upon her public performance before the US Senate, a psychologist trained in intellectual assessment who administers IQ tests regularly might surmise Sonia Sotomayor has a Verbal IQ of merely 88. This would place Sotomayor in the Low Average Range of intellectual functioning.
Moreover, based upon her presentation during this well orchestrated play that masquerades as a Senate hearing for the approval of President Obama’s candidate for the United State’s Supreme Court, one would have to describe Sotomayor as deceptive, disingenuous and a Trojan horse.
Come to think of it, she is the ideal bookend match for that Kenyan Bastard in the White House!
After all, Obama is the ultimate Trojan horse!!!
However, to be fair, based upon her presentation and vocabulary employed thus far during this tightly managed public presentation, Sotomayor might possibly approach but would not break 110 on her Full Scale Intelligence Quotient.
At best, Sotomayor has an average IQ, but I certainly want someone smarter than myself on the highest court in the land.
2001 speech at the University of California’s Berkeley School of Law
Folks, just disclosed by Michael Savage on his talk radio show “The Savage Nation:” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court is a member of the fanatical racist separatist group know as “La Raza” which means “The Race.” As a member of La Raza Sotomayor is unfit for any bench, most certainly Sotomayor should be eliminated as a nominee to a life time appointment to the highest court in the land!
This is a Call to Action!
Let your Senators know that you wnat Sotomayor’s nomination quashed, shut down, and you don’t want to hear about her ever again.
End the racism.
Stop the racists.
Wake up America!
Letter to the Editor
For Immediate Release
Jim Deakin US Senate Candidate for Arizona in 2010 www.jimdeakin.com
US Supreme Court – Nominee Sonia Sotomayor
Sonia Sotomayor is being touted as “Saving Baseball” with her 1995 ruling which assisted in the ending of the Baseball Strike.
But, did she really save baseball? Or destroy baseball?
The Sotomayor ruling negated the rights of the owners of Major League Baseball. With limits set to the rights of the owners they were forced to accept the terms set by the baseball players union. Those terms have resulted in $100Million, $140Million and $200Million dollar contracts.
The unlimited player salaries have resulted in tax payer financing of baseball stadiums.
The unlimited player salaries have resulted in higher ticket, parking and concession prices.
The unlimited player salaries have resulted in the era of “Steroids” and “HGH”. A batter who hit 10 additional home runs per year resulted in $50Million additional salary.
Her ruling may have expedited the end of the strike. Her ruling did not help the tax payers. Her ruling did not help baseball fans. Her ruling did not help baseball statistics. Her ruling did not adequately perceive the future implications and unintended consequences.
Diversity brings perspective. The US Supreme Court deserves perspective tempered by humility and forethought of consequences.
That’s the Question of the Day!