Conversation with G. Edward Griffin Author of “The Creature From Jekyll Island” Part I

May 17th, 2009

Telephone Interview recorded on an old mono casette deck on March 25, 2009. 

Part I of two parts. 

Minimal editing, noise reduction. 

My apologies for the poor sound quality.  Still, I think it worth tolerating and listening. 

Mr. Edward Griffin remains sharp and although Mr. Griffin is my senior, Ed is a quicker thinker than I.

ENJOY!

2009325A

Every American citizen needs to read this!

May 16th, 2009

 

Theodore Roosevelt’s ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907:

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

“In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. 

But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American … There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag … We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language … and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.” (emphasis and spacing added)

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

KTAR 92.3 FM Mac & Gaydos Child Porn Experts?

May 15th, 2009

  

Are Mac & Gaydos child porn experts?

 

The reason I ask is because during the Mac & Gaydos Show yesterday afternoon I heard another horrific public utterance on KTAR 92.3 FM.  It really bothers me there is so much dumb programming on KTAR.

 

While Ankarlo’s utterance urging possibly homicidal individuals to commit suicide may have had a remote modicum of socially redeeming value, Mac & Gaydos’ utterances yesterday utterly astounded me with their sheer stupidity.

 

The management of KTAR needs to start paying close attention to exactly what is going out over the air.  

 

I thought it kind of stupid a while back when Gaydos readily admitted he voted for Barack Obama.  But yesterday, Mac & Gaydos may have convicted themselves publicly during their broadcast of possible possession of child pornography!

 

Let me explain about yesterday’s show:

 

Both Mac & Gaydos agreed and emphasized a picture of a 16-year-old female published in her Florida high school yearbook was “definitely child pornography.”

 

And both Mac & Gaydos concurred neither felt any sympathy for this young girl who had neglected to dress appropriately.

 

Now, before any of you (my readers) decide to Google and search for that photograph of this adolescent female, DON’T!

 

Don’t do it because if what Mac & Gaydos said is accurate, then any person who has a picture of that under aged female’s private parts on his or her computer might be guilty of possessing “child pornography” under Federal law!

 

To the best of my knowledge it doesn’t matter what one’s intent is. All that matters is possession.  Moreover, each photograph is one count.  Each count gets one 10 years in prison.  That’s 10 years of Federal time, hard time with no relief.

 

If Mac & Gaydos Goggled the Internet at work on KTAR’s computers, then the computers at KTAR may contain “child porn!”

 

Folks, the laws have gotten very technical and extremely punitive. Even for the purposes of making a news report, if one accesses such a photograph, then one may be guilty of federal child porn laws.

 

Even Joe Crummy last evening publically added to the humiliation of another minor.  A 17 year old girl in Arizona had her photo published in her Tonopah high school year book with a cruel label.

 

KTAR really needs to monitor their programming.  I just can’t believe how dumb some of the talk show hosts seem to be at KTAR. 

 

Did you hear Mac & Gaydos became self proclaimed child pornography experts yesterday?

 

Post Script

 

During lunch I explained to my waitress my reservations about posting this.  While most of the spam comments I get are from on line sales of pharmaceuticals, of drugs, I really do not want the tag “child pornography” on my blog.

 

My blog already has 1581 spam comments and only 160 real comments about half of which are my responses to comments.  I am not looking forward to more spam from porn sites and pornographers.

 

But, as the waitress said, I am right. 

 

As an adult male the last thing I would utter publically is that I looked at anything that resembled in anyway child pornography!

 

As adults we need to avoid adding to the burdens of any one who is under age, of any minor considering the added strain young people are already under in our current culture.

 

Again, just because Mac & Gaydos apparently accessed such photographs, don’t you do it because it would be a crime!  Let the fools go on thinking they are free to view such photos with impunity.  Maybe the FBI ought to give KTAR a call.

 

 

Obama’s ASU Commencement Speech Holds Neither Water or Substance

May 14th, 2009

 

Liar-in-Chief President Obama continues in his fine tradition of lying and deceiving.  Even I must admit Obama’s presentation is great.  But Barrack Hussein Obama’s teleprompter reading talents belong on the evening news rather than in the office of the American President!

 

Take my life as an example:  I lived for greater causes and, more specifically, I lived to help others better themselves.  I did this in the Alaskan Bush, in the Deep South and in Indian country. 

 

What I learned is that the world is ruled by raw power and those “illiberals” in political office abuse their power to protect their fellow criminals.

 

Take the Arizona Department of Corrections for example. 

 

While I made major contributions as best I was allowed to providing better services and releasing a “safer product,” the graft & greed in ADOC Mental Health and Counseling & Treatment Services was only exceeded by their audacity in using raw power to harm anyone who did his job according to the Arizona State Revised Statues (ASRS), all the Rule & Regulations and ADOC Policy.

 

In fact, Obama rewarded those culprits by appointing their chief-in-crime to Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.  And Janet took her lover Dora with her to Washington, DC. 

 

None dare call it nepotism.

 

While the minions below got away with murder, fraud, theft, rape, and all sorts of felonies. 

 

So, crime does pay—at least for those “illiberals” sharing the same philosophy—while lying, cheating and deceiving America and the US Treasury!

 

However, President Obama’s commencement address at Arizona State University is for me personally inspiring:

 

I shall continue to give my all to bettering those poor people who have been unable and are unable to defend themselves—especially those dead inmates. 

 

Schriro allowed the cover ups and ultimately Director Dora Schriro covered those murders up! 

 

While they literally buried the “evidence,” ADOC and Dr. Susanne Arnold and Dr. Pamela McCauley allowed the culprit to continue practicing & harming inmate patients and defrauding the State.

 

 

 

 

“Validation”

May 14th, 2009

“Validation” is a fable about the magic of free parking. Starring TJ Thyne & Vicki Davis. Writer/Director/Composer – Kurt Kuenne. Winner – Best Narrative Short, Cleveland Int’l Film Festival

-delayed cookies enabled-

-for your security-

-on Dr Kent’s Blog-

View with confidence

Swine Flu Humor & Baxter Pharmaceuticals Roles (plural)

May 13th, 2009

-For Your Security-

-Delayed Cookies Enabled-

-On All YouTube Videos Posted on Dr Kent’s Blog-

-View with Confidence-

 Driving Toons with Alan Park: Eps. 3 Swine Flu to Scare You

Obama Budget Cuts Visualization

May 12th, 2009

-Enabled Delayed Cookies-

For Your Secrity

on Dr. Kent's Blog

view in confidence

 

Killer Chemtrails: The Shocking Truth

May 12th, 2009

Are they merely "Little Fluffy Clouds?"

 –Delayed Cookies Enabled-

-For Your security on Dr. Kent’s Blog-

view in confidence

FYI:  I recall the first I heard of seeding the atmosphere with aluminum in approximately the 1970’s in order to reflect sunlght and combat possible Global Warming.

Montana Governor Signs New Gun Law: HB246 Montana Firearms Freedom Act

May 11th, 2009

This is Courtesy of Fellow Waterfowl Hunters in the Heartland.

With the Signing of This Bill, Montana Joins the Ranks of the Ever so Few Desirable States to Inhabit as Freemen.

That is, until Other States Follow Their Good Examples.

I have only corrected punctuation and one obvious spelling error in the bill text; otherwise, it is posted verbatim:

HB246 Montana Firearms Freedom Act

Montana Governor Signs New Gun Law

Executive Summary – The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY. The State of Montana has defied the federal government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana. The federal government fears citizens owning guns. They try to curtail what types of guns they can own. The gun control laws all have one common goal—confiscation of privately owned firearms.

Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government. The fed now either takes them on and risks them saying the federal agents have no right to violate their state gun laws and arrest the federal agents that try to enforce the federal firearms acts. This will be a world-class event to watch. Montana could go to voting for secession from the union, which is really throwing the gauntlet in Obama’s face. If the federal government does nothing they lose face. Gotta love it.

Important Points – If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines. Montana has the law on their side. Since when did the USA start following their own laws especially the constitution of the USA, the very document that empowers the USA?

Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered. As a note silencers were first used before the 007 movies as a device to enable one to hunt without disturbing neighbors and scaring game. They were also useful as devices to control noise when practicing so as to not disturb the neighbors.

Silencers work best with a bolt-action rifle. There is a long barrel and the chamber is closed tight so as to direct all the gases though the silencer at the tip of the barrel. Semi-auto pistols and revolvers do not really muffle the sound very well except on the silver screen. The revolvers bleed gas out with the sound all over the place. The semi-auto pistols bleed the gases out when the slide recoils back.

Silencers are maybe nice for snipers picking off enemy soldiers even though they reduce velocity but not very practical for hit men shooting pistols in crowded places. Silencers were useful tools for gun enthusiasts and hunters.

There would be no firearm registration, serial numbers, criminal records check, waiting periods or paperwork required. So in a short period of time there would be millions and millions of unregistered untraceable guns in Montana. . . Way to go Montana!

Discussion – Let us see what Obama does. If he hits Montana hard they will probably vote to secede from the USA. The governor of Texas has already been refusing Federal money because he does not want to agree to the conditions that go with it and he has been saying secession is a right they have as sort of a threat. Things are no longer the same with the USA. Do not be deceived by Obama acting as if all is the same, it is not.

Text of the New Law

HOUSE BILL NO. 246

INTRODUCED BY J. BONIEK, BENNETT, BUTCHER, CURTISS, RANDALL, WARBURTON

AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 6] may be cited as the “Montana Firearms Freedom Act”.

Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 6] is the following:

(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights, as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.

(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists, as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 6], the following definitions apply:

(1) “Borders of Montana” means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.

(2) “Firearms accessories” means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.

(3) “Generic and insignificant parts” includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.

(4) “Manufactured” means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.

Section 4. Prohibitions. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.

Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:

(1) A firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;

(2) A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;

(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or

(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Section 6. Marketing of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 6] must have the words “Made in Montana” clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.

Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 6] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 6].

Section 8. Applicability. [This act] applies to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured, as defined in [section 3], and retained in Montana after October 1, 2009.

-I think it’s Brilliant-

What Do You think?