Posts Tagged ‘Sonia Sotomayor’

Sonia Sotomayor—Stupidest Justice Ever on the United States Supreme Court

Sunday, July 19th, 2009


Based upon Sonia Sotomayor’s presentation and the vocabulary Sotomayor has employed thus far in this public debacle that attempts to pass for a “Senate Confirmation Hearing,” Sotomayor could not break 110 on her Full Scale Intellectual Quotient.


This should strike fear into the heart of the American citizenry.  We are likely for an extremely rough ride with Sotomayor in a lifetime appointment on the United States Supreme Court.


If Sotomayor is so dumb, how did she become an attorney much less a judge in any court?


How did Sotomayor get where she is?


It’s simple:


Sotomayor is an “affirmative action baby.”


Sonia is an Affirmative Action Baby.


Sotomayor Has an Abysmally Low IQ

Saturday, July 18th, 2009


Based upon her public performance before the US Senate, a psychologist trained in intellectual assessment who administers IQ tests regularly might surmise Sonia Sotomayor has a Verbal IQ of merely 88.  This would place Sotomayor in the Low Average Range of intellectual functioning.


Moreover, based upon her presentation during this well orchestrated play that masquerades as a Senate hearing for the approval of President Obama’s candidate for the United State’s Supreme Court, one would have to describe Sotomayor as deceptive, disingenuous and a Trojan horse.


Come to think of it, she is the ideal bookend match for that Kenyan Bastard in the White House!


After all, Obama is the ultimate Trojan horse!!!


However, to be fair, based upon her presentation and vocabulary employed thus far during this tightly managed public presentation, Sotomayor might possibly approach but would not break 110 on her Full Scale Intelligence Quotient.


At best, Sotomayor has an average IQ, but I certainly want someone smarter than myself on the highest court in the land.


Wouldn’t you?


Sonia Sotomayor ‘La Raza member’

Friday, May 29th, 2009

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”


–Sonia Sotomayor


2001 speech at the University of California’s Berkeley School of Law

Breaking News: Sonia Sotomayor is a Member of the Racist Extremist Group “La Raza”

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Folks, just disclosed by Michael Savage on his talk radio show “The Savage Nation:”  Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court is a member of the fanatical racist separatist group know as “La Raza” which means “The Race.”  As a member of La Raza Sotomayor is unfit for any bench, most certainly Sotomayor should be eliminated as a nominee to a life time appointment to the highest court in the land!

This is a Call to Action!

Let your Senators know that you wnat Sotomayor’s nomination quashed, shut down, and you don’t want to hear about her ever again.

End the racism.

Stop the racists.

Wake up America!

Senate Candidate Jim Deakin’s Letter per the Sonia Sotomayor Supreme Court Nomination

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009


Letter to the Editor

For Immediate Release

Jim Deakin US Senate Candidate for Arizona in 2010

US Supreme Court – Nominee Sonia Sotomayor

Sonia Sotomayor is being touted as “Saving Baseball” with her 1995 ruling which assisted in the ending of the Baseball Strike.

But, did she really save baseball? Or destroy baseball?

The Sotomayor ruling negated the rights of the owners of Major League Baseball. With limits set to the rights of the owners they were forced to accept the terms set by the baseball players union. Those terms have resulted in $100Million, $140Million and $200Million dollar contracts.

The unlimited player salaries have resulted in tax payer financing of baseball stadiums.

The unlimited player salaries have resulted in higher ticket, parking and concession prices.

The unlimited player salaries have resulted in the era of “Steroids” and “HGH”. A batter who hit 10 additional home runs per year resulted in $50Million additional salary.

Her ruling may have expedited the end of the strike. Her ruling did not help the tax payers. Her ruling did not help baseball fans. Her ruling did not help baseball statistics. Her ruling did not adequately perceive the future implications and unintended consequences.

Diversity brings perspective. The US Supreme Court deserves perspective tempered by humility and forethought of consequences.