Posts Tagged ‘Complaint Screening Committee’
Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
Here’s the original PDF for the converted and cut & pasted document below: <right click> and <save target as> to download
2008-05-10-complaint-orig
Stay tuned to Dr Kent’s Blog and tell everyone you know.
There is indeed a lot more to this story!
May 10, 2008
Sonja Bolf, Executive Director
Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 1400 West Washington, Room 235
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Via CERTIFIED U.S. MAIL
-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED‑
Re: Request for Investigation: Susanne Arnold, Ph.D.
Negligence and Neglect Leading to Unnecessary Loss of Lives and Other.
Dear Executive Director Sonja Bolf:
Attached is my completed formal Request for Investigation form. In 2005, I attempted to work closely with the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiner’s Investigator David S. Shapiro; however, rather than work with me on very serious concerns, Mr. Shapiro made some sort of report to the Board indicating that I was perhaps mentally unstable. Mr. Shapiro’s report, whatever it was, was cited by a Board member along with Dr. McCauley’s written response to the Board in a motion ordering me to undergo scrutiny at my expense. That was my second RFI generated internally by this Board.
Allow me to give you some history: After introducing myself to Mr. Shapiro in person at the Board’s office, I expressed my concerns over my duty to report to the Board in light of the overwhelming number of violations of our Rules & Regulations and Arizona Revised Statutes I observed. I asked Mr. Shapiro for advice on how I should handle these matters, and after discussing multiple concerns, Investigator Shapiro told me he thought I could not bring all of those matters to the attention of his Board. More importantly, Mr. Shapiro asked me to bring this complaint regarding the loss of life to the Board.
At that time, I was working within the Arizona Department of Corrections with other professional staff attempting to obtain identifying information regarding the victim(s). Nonetheless, due to the manner in which records are kept in ADOC, after a lot of time and effort, we were not able to obtain the information necessary to come forward with a pressing case. Notwithstanding, we knew several important things. Let me explain Dr. Susanne Arnold’s role in all of this:
Dr. Arnold hired a man who was not qualified to provide professional psychiatric services for ADOC. Dr. Arnold failed to check this applicant’s credentials. I believe, David Rupley, Jr., MD(H) worked at the Arizona State Prison Complexes in Florence and Eyman and other locations in ADOC providing psychiatric services.
Dr. Arnold knowingly signed off on this man’s hours even though she knew they were fraudulent. That is, he had not worked them and she allowed him to defraud the State of significant sums of money. This is why they retaliated against me and sought to destroy me by conspiring to bring false allegations of sexual harassment against me. See attachments. There is more, far more to the story.
Dr. Arnold refused to take necessary action to correct this man’s practice in psychiatry. Specifically, Dr. Arnold failed to correct Dr. Rupley in his failure to monitor the psychiatric medications he was prescribing. More specifically, for more than an entire year, she failed to require Rupley to follow the standard of care of the community, through Arizona and across the entire country. That is, some of these psychiatric medications have Black Box Warnings regarding the necessity to check liver profiles in order to avoid death by agranular cytosis, i.e. Depakote.
Moreover, I have reason to believe that Dr. Arnold knew about several unnecessary inmate deaths. All due to medication errors. All committed by Dr. Rupley between 2002 and 2003. YET, Dr. Arnold allowed Dr. Rupley to continue working at ADOC for at least another full year unimpeded and uncorrected! And Dr. Rupley in all likelihood was allowed to kill more men! Dr. Arnold enabled this horrible malpractice by David Rupley, Jr., MD(H)!
I also brought this to the attention of the Board’s next investigator. When she and I talked on the telephone, she became upset and yelled at me. She told me this Board was ill equipped to handle those matters. Moreover, she told me there were other agencies to which I should make my reports. I have followed her advice to no avail—other than to get myself targeted for more harassment from this Board.
Lastly, when I was notified of a fifth complaint against me before this Board (submitted by the former Director or Programs for ADOC who, by the way, resigned in lieu of termination for having committed real sexual harassment [quid pro quo]); I called the Board’s former Executive Director Mrs. Maxine McCarthy. I wanted to inquire as to the nature of the matter brought to the Board’s attention as no information was forthcoming other than an invitation to the Board’s hearing on August 18, 2006.
When I called Maxine McCarthy on approximately August 15, 2006, I was still reeling and recovering from my chemical ordeal subsequent to the improper discontinuation (under physician’s orders) of bromocriptine on March 30, 2006. In that condition, I was defenseless. Executive Director Maxine McCarthy tried to take me into her confidence. She asked me what was going on: “What’s going on? What’s been going on? You can tell me anything. It’s not going any further.”
While I was in bad shape, I still recognized that whatever I told her would be going further. I acted somewhat impulsively and I told her truthfully and candidly what was behind the efforts to retaliate against me. I told Mrs. McCarthy that there had been an unlicensed psychiatrist at ADOC. He killed several inmates with his medications, and they were trying to hide the deaths.
To which, McCarthy exclaimed and demanded: “You mean we haven’t heard the last of this yet?”
Straight forward,
Completed 2-page RFI form.
|
Enclosures (With One Complete Copy):
Personal Notes August 27, 2002, Personal Notes September 24, 2002 Personal Notes October 08, 2002, Personal Notes (b) October 08, 2002, Personal Notes October 24, 2002 (2p), Meeting Notes October 24, 2002 (3p hand written), Personal Notes October 24, 2002, Information Report October 24, 2002, Personal Notes November 26, 2002, Personal Notes January 14, 2003, Personal Notes February 11, 2003, Personal Notes February 24, 2003, Personal Notes February 24, 2003 (2p), Personal Notes March 03, 2003. Personal Notes (2p), Personal Mental Health Staff Meeting Notes 17 August 2004, Personal Notes August 18, 2004 (2p), Personal Notes August 18, 2004, Personal Notes August 31, 2004 (2p), Personal Notes October 26, 2004, Psychiatry Timesheet for “David Rupley Jr., MD” “Locum Tenens M.D,” 10/13 Central Unit Main Gate Sign-In Log Health Unit October 07, 2002, Personal Notes August 17, 2004 Mental Health Staff Meeting ASPC—Florence. Personal Notes November 6, 2004 Reassignment, August 24, 2005 Grievance #05-023 and #05-P-063 to ADOC Director Dora Schriro.
Cc:
Senator Linda Gray, Chairwoman, Public Safety and Human Services Committee Representative Jerry Weiers, Chairman. Natural Resources and Public Safety Committee Senate Senator Carolyn S. Allen, Chairwoman, Health Committee
Representative Bob Stump, Chairman, Health Committee
Senator Jay Tibshraeny
Representative Wade V. Nichols
Representative Stephen B. Yarbrough
Tags:ADC Director Dora Schriro, ADOC, ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, agranular cytosis, Arizona, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Arizona Governor Napolitano, Arizona Revised Statutes, Arizona State Prison Complex, Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence, Arizona State Prison Complexes, ASPC-Eyman, ASPC—Florence, Black Box Warnings, bromocriptine, character, Complaint Screening Committee, cover ups, cover-up, coverup, coverups, crime, David Rupley, David S. Shapiro, Democrat, Depakote, deriliction of duty, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, Dr. Gary Lovejoy, Dr. Miki Paul, duty to report, Executive Director Sonja Bolf, failure to monitor the psychiatric medications he was prescribing, fraud, fraud & malfeasance, Gary Lovejoy, irreversible lukemia, Janet Napolitano, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, Maxine McCarthy, MD(H), Medical Doctor of Homeopathy, Miki Paul, Mr. Shapiro, murder, Negligence and Neglect Leading to Unnecessary Loss of Lives and Other, New World Order, psychiatry, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, Psychosociopolitical Warfare, Representative Bob Stump, Representative Jerry Weiers, Representative Stephen B. Yarbrough, Representative Wade V. Nichols, Request for Investigation, Request for Investigation: Susanne Arnold, retaliate, retaliation, RFI, Rules & Regulations, Senate Senator Carolyn S. Allen, Senator Jay Tibshraeny, Senator Linda Gray, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Sonja Bolf, Steven Ickes, Susan Arnold, United States of America, Unprofessional Conduct, whistleblower, You mean we haven't heard the last of this yet?
Posted in "The Trial", ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, Arizona Board of Homeopathy & Integrated Medical Examiners, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Certified Investigator, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Dangers in Mental Health Practises, Democratic Party, Executive Director, Iatrogenesis, Janet Napolitano, Joseph Donaldson, Maxine McCarthy, Pamela McCauley, Psychologist, Request for Investigation (RFI), Susan Arnold | No Comments »
Thursday, June 4th, 2009
To download a copy of Maxine McCarthy’s letter of August 15, 2006, right click on the file immediately below and select <save target as> and select a spot on your computer:
2006-08-15-mccarthy-limitations-upon-priviledge-color
Allow me to comment on the meaning of this evidence. It is important because it demonstrates the idiocy of a specific area of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners’ Rules & Regulations.
Furthermore, McCarthy’s letter and claim introduces the concept of “partially privileged” communications as it pertains to complaints brought before BOMAX, the Arizona Medical Board.
According to my first attorney before the Board, Mr. Stephen Myers, Esq., the “partial privilege” was established for medical doctors when a case was brought before the Arizona Supreme Court; moreover, it remains untested as it pertains to psychologists.
This rule or the lack of this rule demonstrates the over reaching power of the State. Furthermore, this provides fertile ground for the State of Arizona government to be corrupt from top to bottom. Dare I say that Arizona State government is THE MOST CORRUPT of state governments?
I am not saying that there is more corruption in Arizona than, for instance, Chicago and Illinois. What I am saying is the limitations of the rules & regulations and statues empower the State government of Arizona so that no one can overcome it–even when the State is wrong–even when elected public officials, their lackeys and underlings commit serious felonies!
Even if I demonstrated in the courts, Arizona Superior Court followed by the Supreme Court of Arizona, that my Board was used in a criminal fashion {RICO anyone?} to harm and damage me, I could not recover any of my attorney fees and costs!
That would break me. It represents an insurmountable obstacle. Dare I say “organized crime?”
However, since I never made such a statement as Maxine McCarthy claimed in this letter, let us proceed with this door having been opened by Executive Director Maxine McCarthy herself. As you shall see, I will be calling Maxine McCarthy as my witness again towards the end. Needless to say, there is a lot of evidence to present before then.
Below is McCarthy’s letter converted and copied into Dr. Kent’s Blog to facilitate open searching:
|
Board Members
James J. Cox, Ed.D.
Chairperson
Miki Paul, Ph.D.
Vice-Chairperson Gary D. Lovejoy, Ph.D. Secretary
Melissa Del-Colle Joseph C. Donaldson Ramona N. Mellott, Ph.D.
Byron N. Rimm
Maryann Santos de Barona, Ph.D.
Fred Wiggins, Ph.D.
|
|
Staff
Maxine McCarthy Executive Director
Marcus E. Harvey Deputy Director
Vacant Investigator
Shari S. Courtnay Administrative Assistant
|
|
State of Arizona
Board of Psychologist Examiners
1400 West Washington, Suite 235
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phone: (602) 542-8162 Fax: (602) 542-8279
www.psychboard.az.gov info@psychboard.az.gov
|
August 15, 2006
John T. Kent, Ph.D.
933 W. Azalea Place
Chandler, AZ 85248-3911
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received a copy of your e-mail correspondence of August 10 and 11, 2006 to the Executive Director of the State Board of Nursing.
In your e-mail, you state (referring to the Board of Psychologist Examiners) the following: “According to the Rules & Regulations, in the event that a complaint is materially misrepresented, the complaint may not be regarded as privileged and protected.” To my knowledge, this language does not appear either in this Board’s rules or statutes.
As you know, the complaint filed against you by M.K. was dismissed by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee on March 20, 2006 because it was without merit. Therefore, the Board considers this matter closed.
Sincerely,
Maxine McCarthy Executive Director
Tags:Arizona Medical Board, BOMAX, complaint, Complaint Screening Committee, CSC, Esq., Executive Director Maxine McCarthy, lackeys, Limitations on Priviledged Protection, materially misrepresented, Mr. Stephen Myers, Myers, organized crime, partial privilege, RICO, Rules & Regulations, save target as, serious felonies, State of Arizona government corrupt from top to bottom, State of Arizona government to be corrupt from top to bottom, Stephen Myers, the Supreme Court of Arizona, without merit
Posted in "The Trial", Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Maxine McCarthy | 1 Comment »
Friday, March 6th, 2009
rfi08-07silbermannotice-001
While I really do not like having to post this publically about Al Silberman, the story really would be incomplete without it. Dr. Silberman is a moral and ethical psychologist and should not be cast in with the lot. And Al is likeable. However, Silberman’s contributions were significant.
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. -08-07
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding Adolph Silberman, Ed.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-07 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018. Sincerely,
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Rev 1/08
Tags:Adolf, Al Silberman, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Democrat, liberal, liberals, malpractise, political, Psychologist, psychologists, psychology, Silberman, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in Al Silberman, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses | 7 Comments »
Friday, March 6th, 2009
rfi08-08arnoldnotice-001
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
State of Arizona
Board of Psychologist Examiners
1400 West Washington, Suite 235
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phone: (602) 542-8162 Fax: (602) 542-8279
‘N,“ psychboard.az.gov in fc*psychboard.az.gov
Staff
Sonja M. Bolf Executive Director
Meghan Hinckley Deputy Director
Victoria Kamm, CI Investigator
Steve Schroeder Administrative Assistant
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. 08-08
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding Susanne Arnold, Ph.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-08 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018. Sincerely,
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Rev 1 /08
Tags:Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Dr. Arnold, fraud, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, murder, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Susan Arnold
Posted in Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Psychologist, Susan Arnold | No Comments »
Friday, March 6th, 2009
rfi08-04trezisenotice-0011
Above is the scanned accurate .pdf file giving notice of what is cut and pasted below:
March 25, 2008
John Kent, Ph.D. 933 W. Azalea Place Chandler, AZ 85248
Re: RFI No. 08-04
Dear Dr. Kent:
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received your Request for Investigation regarding John Trezise, Ph.D., and an investigation has been initiated. A copy of your complaint has been sent to the psychologist who will be required to respond to the Board, in writing. The psychologist’s response is confidential by law and will not be provided to you.
Please note that if you submit additional complaint information or documents, the Board is required to provide copies of that additional information to the psychologist for a response, which may cause a delay in the resolution of the case. Audio tapes, video tapes or compact discs submitted as part of your complaint must be accompanied by a certified transcript of the entire (not excerpted) proceeding or conversation.
Please be aware that once this case has been scheduled to be heard by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee (CSC), the Board will be unable to accept additional information regarding this matter. Therefore, no supplemental documents or information will be accepted within ten (10) days prior to the scheduled CSC meeting date.
Please be advised of the following information regarding the Board’s investigative procedures: All investigative materials are reviewed by the Board’s investigator who may then contact the psychologist, the complainant and others to obtain additional information or clarify specific issues. The investigator then writes a report and provides the report and documentation to the Complaint Screening Committee at a regularly scheduled meeting. This is the CSC’s initial review of the case and is not a hearing. Please note that witness testimony is not taken unless the case proceeds to a formal hearing. Each and every time that a case appears on the CSC’s agenda, the complainant and the licensee (or their representative) who are present at the CSC meeting, and who wish to address the CSC regarding the complaint may do so by filling out a “Request to Speak” form (which is available at the CSC meeting) and providing it to Board’s staff. Presentations are limited to five minutes and there is no question/answer interaction with the Committee members at this time. An audiotape or CD of the Board’s discussion of the case may be purchased for a charge of $10.00 per audiotape/CD. Copies of the CSC Minutes may also be purchased at $0.25 per page; however, the Minutes often do not contain the details of the audio recordings.
RFI No. 08-04 Page Two
The CSC can vote to dismiss the case if it determines that the complaint is without merit, or refer the complaint to the full Board for further review and action. You will be notified in writing of the CSC’s decision. Enclosed is a schedule of the CSC’s meeting dates. You will receive a written copy of the CSC’s agenda indicating the date of the meeting in which the complaint will be reviewed.
The Board’s mission is to protect the public; however, the Board can only take action against a licensee when it has been determined that there is a violation of the Board’s statutes or rules. The Board cannot remove a psychologist from a particular case, overturn opinions or decisions made by a psychologist, or influence a court of law or a judge to disregard the opinion of a psychologist who has been appointed by the court.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 542-3018.
Sincere
, A
Victoria Kamm, CI Board Investigator
Enclosure
Tags:ADOC, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, Dr. John Trezise, John Trezise, political, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Trezise, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in John Trezise, Psychologist, RFI No. 08-04 | 1 Comment »
Friday, March 6th, 2009
. . . please allow me to begin introducing evidence. Nonetheless, there is a critical communication from McCarthy which I intend to introduce regarding the former Executive Director’s opinion (and hence the Board’s opinion). That communication establishes the basis for revealing what would otherwise be considered “privileged communications.” Thereafter, I will provide more evidence that will convince the reader of a conspiracy to harm me using the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners.
Tags:Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, crime, Executive Director, malfeasance, Maxine McCarthy, Mrs. Maxine McCarthy, Psychologist, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses | No Comments »
Wednesday, March 4th, 2009
Today is a wonderful day. While my spirits have been admittedly low, I hold onto the concepts of ultimate justice & divine retribution. This is the day of the deadline the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners gave me to cough up $15,000 in retainer and be examined by their chosen psychiatrist.
Now, I wouldn’t mind it so much but (1) I don’t have the money and that’s just a “retainer” as Dr. Anna Scherzer might actually require more! And the reason it is so high is because the Board wants to send TWO CARTONS of documents for their good psychiatrist to review at $375/hour!
And (2) I don’t like the Board’s method of swamping their “Independent Medical Examiner” with papers because their procedure is (a) biasing. Is the Board trying to overly direct their IME psychiatrist because they are trying to achieve a particular outcome?
(b) Might the Board and the State be trying to break me in every manner possible, particularly financially? Since they can’t break my spirit.
Also, (c) we did not like the fact the Chairman of the Board, “Larry Loveboy” at the time, refused to share with me or with my attorney the documentation the Board was going to submit to their designated examiner. Does this smell like a setup? Of course, those good folks would never do such a thing! It must be my paranoia.
Since (3) (a) I am unable to afford the Board’s indulgent [$15,000 is just the “retainer.” There is no limit to the expense. I sure wish I could get a job that paid like that!] and (b) potentially biasing methodology [The Board should be required to submit the names of three Independent Medical Examiners just like they required of me in the past.], there is no way I may prevail. Is that what the Board wants? Certainly, not. What am I thinking! After all, these are good people.
And (c) as I do not have adequate representation nor the resources to proceed to court, a new phase has begun. That is (4) my bringing my case before you, the public right here on my blog.
In short order I will call my first witness:
The former Executive Director of the Board, Mrs. Maxine McCarthy.
Tags:Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Complaint Screening Committee, deadline, designated examiner, Dr. Anna Scherzer, Dr. Scherzer, duty to report, Gary Lovejoy, Humor, IME, Independent Medical Examiner, irony, Larry Loveboy, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, Maxine McCarthy, Mrs. Maxine McCarthy, New World Order, paranoia, political, psychiatrist, psychiatry, psychological evaluation, psychologists, psychology, public trial, retaliation, setup, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Humor, Psychosociopolitical Warfare | 1 Comment »
Monday, February 23rd, 2009
20090221.mp3
Here is my last scheduled show at this hour (2-3 PM) on this day (Saturday) on this station (KFNX). While KFNX and staff have been great, due to financial constraints I am going off air for a while. Notwithstanding, it is not because anyone has forced me off the air, it is only because I have not sold the commercial time necessary to support my show.
Should you wish to advertise, sponsor or support my show, email me via my contact page or call the station at (602) 277-1100.
I am open to new avenues and will gladly hear any proposals.
Here, as promised and as is my practise, is my unedited final show without commercials. These are the facts, nothing but the facts. I speak the truth. If you care to disagree, feel free to comment.
During this show, we cover a lot of ground; however, there is more to be told about the crimes & cover ups inside ADOC.
I promised to post a lot more material and I will do so on an ongoing basis. It takes time to keep it organized and there is a lot of material to organize!
I promise to post all Requests For Investigations (RFI’s) and make members of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners famous! Clearly, they have not merely damaged me but the citizens of Arizona and the profession of psychology!!!
Please don’t take my comments lightly that we have become a “communist” nation. We, the USA, are the prize and we are fighting on all fronts. We don’t even realize it! When we go down, there will be nothing standing between them and the little guy around the world. We have to wake up, demand our government back before they take it away and we can never get it back.
Folks, this is real. It is psychosociopoitical warfare. Just look at the manipulation in the news and on TV. Nothing is happening by chance. This is all planned and well engineered. What I learned from my study of music composition is that:
The more random music appears,
The more highly it is organized.
And this functional analysis holds true for life as well.
Tags:ADOC, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Arizona Governor Napolitano, ASPC-F, character, Complaint Screening Committee, crime, Democrat, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, duty to report, FBI, fraud, Janet Napolitano, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, murder, nepotism, New World Order, Obama, political, psychiatry, psychological evaluation, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a patient, Susan Arnold, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, Archived Shows (MP3), Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Democratic Party, KFNX | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 17th, 2009
Having been notified by email that our new Governor can not or will not meet with me, I called NW in the Governor’s office. We are at an impasse after it was suggested I meet with the new Director of ADOC. Therefore,
BE ADVISED DURING THIS NEXT SHOW I WILL NAME NAMES AND DISCUSS OPENLY THE CRIMES THAT WERE COMMITTED INSIDE ADOC BY ADOC PERSONNEL!
Tune in.
Frankly, I think our new Governor is in over her head. While I had hoped to be restored and employed correcting the messes within ADOC, the revelations during this next show are likely to result in major financial losses for the State of Arizona at a time when it can ill afford it. Nevertheless, these people (ADOC and the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners) have damaged me and done their best to destroy me.
Be advised:
We are talking about several frauds & malfeasance, sexual battery, rape of a patient and MURDER.
Many will come forward, rightfully so, seeking justice from an unjust system. Expect the State of Arizona to pay Big Bucks in damages and costly fighting in the United States Supreme Court. Why? Because there is no Sex Offender Treatment Program in ADOC, especially since ADOC and the private prison fired Dr. Susanne Arnold!
Then there are those who were brutally murdered!
By ADOC guards.
By Medical Health Services.
By medically induced leukemia because of the ignorance & negligence of contract psychiatry AND the supervising psychologists (Arnold & McCauley & company) who covered it up, literally burying the evidence, and allowing the culprit to continue practising for more than another year during which he killed more inmate patients.
They weren’t sentenced to DEATH!
They weren’t given sentences of EXECUTION!
Nonetheless, they died. Some horribly, miserably.
Let the State of Arizona pay the price. I am tired of being the brunt of their terror.
Folks, this is “bureaucratic tyranny.”
We have become a communist country.
Wake up!
Wake up! America.
Before it’s too late!
“America, America, where are you now?
Don’t you care about your sons and daughters?”
Monster~Steppenwolf
Tags:ADC, ADOC, Arizoan Department of Corrections, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Arizona Governor Napolitano, communism, communist.ommunists, Complaint Screening Committee, crime, crimes, death sentence, death sentences, Democrat, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, duty to report, economy, execution, FBI, fraud, Govenor Jan Brewer, Governor Brewer, Jan Brewer, Janet Napolitano, liberal, liberals, malfeasance, malpractise, murder, nepotism, Ph.D., psychiatry, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologist sex with a patient, psychologists, psychology, rape, retaliation, Sex Offender Treatment Program, sex with a client, sex with a patient, sexual assault, sexual battery, Susan Arnold, Unprofessional Conduct
Posted in ADC (Arizona Department of "Corruption" aka Arizona Department of Corrections), ADOC Director Dora SCHRIRO, Anne Middaugh, Arizona Board of Homeopathy & Integrated Medical Examiners, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Attorney General Terry Goddard, Coming Shows, Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Jeffrey Golde, John Trezise, Pamela McCauley, Sex Offender Treatment Program (SOTP), Susan Arnold | 1 Comment »
Friday, February 6th, 2009
While my attorney said he represented Dr. Anne Middaugh, the outcome of RFI No. 05-04 is difficult to determine. In part because Dr. Middaugh is no longer listed as holding an Arizona psychologist license and there is no reference on the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiner’s WebPages on Past Board Actions to any action taken against this psychologist. And in part because it appeared from his report that Dr. Middaugh was merely given a “slap on the hand” by the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners.
Please note I admired Dr. Middaugh’s presentation before the Board and her candor in her recorded presentation. (See previous posting in my blog) However, that does not mean the truth was completely told.
I was informed Dr. Middaugh was consequated with a 30-day suspension and assigned taking extra Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) (i.e. training) in “boundaries” and that was all. It was reported to me that Dr. Middaugh informed the Board that she did not conduct “interpersonal therapy” with her new husband/former patient and ward of the State/ADOC inmate but, rather, ‘she had merely treated her husband for “substance abuse.”’
However, at the time it was against ADOC policy for psychologists or mental health staff to treat inmates for substance abuse. For some time prior, all substance abuse treatment was delegated to the Corrections Officer III’s (CO III’s) otherwise known as “counselors” or “Care Bears” whose primary function is “classification” and the placement of inmates. This was because of a turf battle over a tremendous amount of federal funding that used to be made available for substance abuse treatment.
Needless-to-say, mental health and health services lost that battle with Security to the CO III’s. However, that has changed now that there is no funding for substance abuse treatment and Security has done its best to shuck off substance abuse treatment duties to mental health staff.
Funny thing is one of the CO III’s at ASPC-F South Unit provided such wonderful substance abuse groups that I as mental health professional at ADOC was embarrassed! It was cognitively based and even though Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) was the only therapy approved for use in ADOC, I saw little to none of it conducted!
Back to my story, I was so impressed by this CO III, this Care Bear and his substance abuse treatment approach that when I caught wind his Deputy Warden wanted to shut his groups down and re-assign him towards more classification tasks, I bought the DW lunch and implored her to keep his program!
There is no treatment in ADOC in mental health. For the most part it’s just like the rest of ADOC:
It’s a Paper Tiger.
ADOC’s Motto:
“If it’s not on paper, it didn’t happen.”
Likewise,
“We’ll make up and write up whatever lies we (ADOC) see fit to foist off, whatever “reality” we (ADOC) want—on the public, inmates and employees alike!”
Tags:ADOC, ADOC inmate, ADOC's Motto, Anne Middaugh, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners, Arizona Department of Corrections, ASPC-F, boundaries, Car Bears, Care Bear, CBT, CEU's, classification, CO III, CO III's, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Complaint Screening Committee, Continuing Education Units, Correction Officer III's, counselor, Deputy Warden, Dr. Anne Middaugh, Dr. Arnold, DW, falsehood, federal funding, inmate, inmate placement, interpersonal therapy, liberal, liberals, lies, mental health staff, Middaugh, motto, Paper Tiger, placement, placement of inmates, professional boundaries, Psychologist, Psychologist III, psychologists, psychology, reality, Request for Investigation, RFI No. 05-04, sex with a patient, slap on the hand, South Unit, substance abuse, substance abuse treatment, Susan Arnold, suspension, turf battle, Unprofessional Conduct, ward of the State
Posted in Anne Middaugh, Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners Abuses, Arizona Department of "Corruption" (ADOC) [Arizona Department of Corrections], Corruption of Elected Public Officials, Request for Investigation (RFI), RFI No. 05-04, Susan Arnold | 2 Comments »