Posts Tagged ‘complaint’

Executive Director Maxine McCarthy: Limitations on “Privileged Communications”

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

To download a copy of Maxine McCarthy’s letter of August 15, 2006, right click on the file immediately below and select <save target as> and select a spot on your computer:


Allow me to comment on the meaning of this evidence.  It is important because it demonstrates the idiocy of a specific area of the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners’ Rules & Regulations.

Furthermore, McCarthy’s letter and claim introduces the concept of “partially privileged” communications as it pertains to complaints brought before BOMAX, the Arizona Medical Board.

According to my first attorney before the Board, Mr. Stephen Myers, Esq., the “partial privilege” was established for medical doctors when a case was brought before the Arizona Supreme Court; moreover, it remains untested as it pertains to psychologists.

This rule or the lack of this rule demonstrates the over reaching power of the State.  Furthermore, this provides fertile ground for the State of Arizona government to be corrupt from top to bottom.  Dare I say that Arizona State government is THE MOST CORRUPT of state governments?

I am not saying that there is more corruption in Arizona than, for instance, Chicago and Illinois.  What I am saying is the limitations of the rules & regulations and statues empower the State government of Arizona so that no one can overcome it–even when the State is wrong–even when elected public officials, their lackeys and underlings commit serious felonies! 

Even if I demonstrated in the courts, Arizona Superior Court followed by the Supreme Court of Arizona, that my Board was used in a criminal fashion {RICO anyone?} to harm and damage me, I could not recover any of my attorney fees and costs!

That would break me.  It represents an insurmountable obstacle.  Dare I say “organized crime?”

However, since I never made such a statement as Maxine McCarthy claimed in this letter, let us proceed with this door having been opened by Executive Director Maxine McCarthy herself.  As you shall see, I will be calling Maxine McCarthy as my witness again towards the end.  Needless to say, there is a lot of evidence to present before then.

Below is McCarthy’s letter converted and copied into Dr. Kent’s Blog to facilitate open searching:

Board Members

James J. Cox, Ed.D.

Miki Paul, Ph.D.

Vice-Chairperson Gary D. Lovejoy, Ph.D. Secretary

Melissa Del-Colle Joseph C. Donaldson Ramona N. Mellott, Ph.D.

Byron N. Rimm

Maryann Santos de Barona, Ph.D.

Fred Wiggins, Ph.D.



Maxine McCarthy Executive Director

Marcus E. Harvey Deputy Director

Vacant Investigator

Shari S. Courtnay Administrative Assistant

State of Arizona
Board of Psychologist Examiners

1400 West Washington, Suite 235
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Phone: (602) 542-8162             Fax: (602) 542-8279


August 15, 2006

John T. Kent, Ph.D.

933 W. Azalea Place

Chandler, AZ 85248-3911

Dear Dr. Kent:

The Board of Psychologist Examiners has received a copy of your e-mail correspondence of August 10 and 11, 2006 to the Executive Director of the State Board of Nursing.

In your e-mail, you state (referring to the Board of Psychologist Examiners) the following: “According to the Rules & Regulations, in the event that a complaint is materially misrepresented, the complaint may not be regarded as privileged and protected.” To my knowledge, this language does not appear either in this Board’s rules or statutes.

As you know, the complaint filed against you by M.K. was dismissed by the Board’s Complaint Screening Committee on March 20, 2006 because it was without merit. Therefore, the Board considers this matter closed.



Maxine McCarthy Executive Director


Attorney General Terry Goddard MUST RESIGN!

Monday, February 2nd, 2009



Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard must resign because his office is so corruptly run that justice in Arizona is “perverted.”  How is justice perverted?  Attorney General Terry Goddard allows “crosstalk” between various arms of his office when in fact those functions are supposed to run separately because of obvious conflicts of interest.  It is just a matter of common sense.


How do I know this?  Because I’m from Alaska and in Alaska when we need to checkout lines (of communication) we run a test.  We run a test “pig.”  


I have done this several times.  How did I do this?  I have placed separate serious complaints through various discrete State agencies—in part to see if the information from one complaint might show up in another “pig.”


That is, I filed one set of information in a complaint with a particular agency of the State and by policy & common sense ethics such complaints & information should be held discretely & confidentiality.  Nonetheless, in every instance Attorney General Terry Goddard’s offices have failed to (A) maintain confidentiality and to (B) process serious complaints in a manner becoming & befitting the office of the individual who is responsible for enforcing the laws of the land, the laws of the State of Arizona.


Every serious felony, crime and infraction about which I have reported has been thwarted—all in the name of protecting the former Democratic Governor Janet Napolitano and her lesbian lover and cabinet level appointee Dora Schriro, former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC).


Furthermore, while I have no evidence of such, when I was working on the Len Munsil campaign I met two women who told me they both work (or worked) in Attorney General Terry Goddard’s offices. Both claimed that they witnessed a bribe of $2 million right under their noses.  They claimed this $2,000,000 bribe went to the Attorney General!  That was at the time Jim Pederson was running for the Senate against Senator Jon Kyl and both women claimed that is where the money came from.  


I, however, have no idea if their claims might be true.   Nonetheless, I guess the message is:


It’s okay to lie, cheat & steal and subvert and commit any


crime you want as long as you are a member of the


 Democratic Party, the “People’s Party.”  Dare I say,


“Communist Party?”