Posts Tagged ‘Arizona Attorney General’s Office’

Is Attorney General Terrance Goddard Concealing a Past Party Gay Lifestyle?

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

According to a retired Phoenix police officer, he remembers quite well answering calls for police assistance many times to Arizona Attorney General Terrance Goddard’s residence.   As an eye witness he reported that it was obvious that those were gay sex parties and that Goddard was living a homosexual lifestyle.   The parties at Goddard’s home were so wild that often the Phoenix police were called to quell disorderly conduct and assist Terry Goddard and his friends.  He believes Terry Goddard may have married in order to put on a public front for political purposes and conceal his lurid past from voters.

When you vote in and hire “perverts,” you get “justice perverted,” especially in Arizona.  Homosexuals do their best bending over backwards, not merely to cover their asses, but to aid & abet other homosexuals in the commission and cover up of heinous crimes.  The result has been an economic crisis for the State of Arizona resulting in harsh oppression as the people are suppressed and courts used unconstitutionally to collect “taxes” in the form of photo radar tickets.

Due to years of fraud & malfeasance by the former governor, the State of Arizona has been forced to drastically curtain essential services of government.  The result is Arizona is no longer a safe place to live. 

News, in both print and on television and on radio, even so-called “conservative” talk radio, has been filtered and the violence is under reported.  When the news on KFYI gets censored across a period of merely four hours and that gun battle involving automatic weapons fire on the west side of Phoenix that occurred before noon is no longer reported by the evening news during drive time, you know there is an organized effort by a well-oiled machine.  And it matters not which party is in power.

How Much Could I Expect to Bear & to Lose in Pursuit of Justice?

Friday, June 5th, 2009

In answer to that question, the first step, “a fair hearing” before an administrative law judge who is employed by the State (conflict of interest), would require a retainer of $25,000; however, due to the shear volume of material, I could see that quickly doubling or tripling.

The Attorney General’s Office for the State of Arizona is famous for “burying one in paper.”  The AG’s Office generates so much paper that one’s legal fees quickly become insurmountable.  And since one can not recoup one’s legal fees from the State, even when one prevails, one loses.

In my case, the secretary for the psychiatrist’s offices assigned to examine me informed me that their office’s “retainer” of $15,000 was required because the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners’ Investigator Victoria Kamm reported there were “two cases of documents” the Board was going to submit to Dr. Anna Scherzer for her review.

Two cases!  I wonder what the State has assembled?  Probably more falsified information and half truths generated by my detractors.

Yes, it was a “conspiracy,” but until you’ve had a chance to review all the material for yourself, reserve judgement.  Then you decide for yourself whether or not the term “conspiratorial” fits.

Thereafter, going to the Superior Court of Arizona where the real Rules of Evidence apply and one has a fair shot could cost between $170,000 and $250,000.

However, even that would not suffice because one has to appeal to the Supreme Court of Arizona due to the Arizona Board of Psychologists Examiners Rules & Regulations as previously evinced by former Board Executive Director Maxine McCarthy and as advised by my former counsel Mr. Stephen Myers.

Even assuming the most conservative amounts, legal fees before getting to the highest court in the State easily exceed $200,000.

Now, how much do you think legal fees for an appearance before the Supreme Court of Arizona would add to that burden?

And all of this is merely for the “privilege” of practising psychology in the State of Arizona.

That is not for a position, nor is it guaranteeing income.

As we shall see, while we are all taught:

The purpose  of licensure is for the safety of the public.

What you shall see is that the function is entirely apposite–licensure protects the State & those corrupt politicians who run it–while making the public and professionals game for the terrorism of the state bureaucracy.

And the real answer to the question?

I lose everything.