In my opinion, President Obama’s recent Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian.
Likewise, Secretary of Homeland Security and former Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano is most definitely a practicing lesbian who is in a long-term relationship with her former cabinet level appointee, the former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections Dora Schriro. However, Schriro may be bi-sexual.
But, not Elena Kagan. After all my years of experience as a psychologist (retired due to the harassment of Napolitano’s hacks on the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners) in my opinion Kagan is a pure lesbian.
Far more importantly, in my opinion, Elena Kagan is NOT qualified to be appointed to the United States Supreme Court! In fact, I do not think Kagan should be a judge in ANY court. However, I would not be averse to some jurisdiction appointing Ms. Kagan to preside over some Small Claims Court occasionally on a substitute basis so that Ms. Elena Kagan, Esquire might get relevant experience and so that we might see how she might perform.
Being a lesbian, in my opinion, does not necessarily disqualify a woman from being in public service; nonetheless, failing to acknowledge one’s sexuality IS a reason to disqualify a woman from public office, especially when that woman appoints her lesbian lover to a sensitive position underneath her such as a cabinet level appointee. That would be evidence of boundary issues and very poor judgement.
Should the REPUBLICAN SENATORS FAIL TO FILIBUSTER AND DENY PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SECOND SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, that will be evidence that there is no Republican Party and the situation for our country is HOPELESS.
Think of the working environment that would create to appoint this unqualified person to the United States Supreme Court: It would be a nightmare for the truly qualified justices and we may lose them due to the hostile environment Kagan would push upon them! We need to make sure that only well-qualified judges with experience are appointed to the Supreme Court least we risk alienating those Honorable Justices already serving!
Furthermore, it is in President Obama’s best interest* that this unqualified liberal who has already demonstrated her willingness to wrongly use her position to push her radial political agenda is not confirmed by the US Senate. Kagan did it at Harvard and she will do it on the Supreme Court if she is appointed.
The best judge of future behavior is past behavior.
If we had a Constitutional Legislature, this would not happen. In fact, had our Senate the structure originally written by our founders, it would never happen. In my opinion, the Seventeenth Amendment is unconstitutional and would not survive a Supreme Court challenge. It would be thrown out!
Any sitting REPUBLICAN SENATOR who fails to take an active role in the filibuster to block Kagan’s appointment needs to be recalled and needs to be unseated by any means at the earliest opportunity–especially those up for re-election this year 2010 and thereafter.
*Obama is too narcissistic to realize this. But, then, Stalin-like sociopathy overrules everything about the man.
Tags: 17th Amendment, 2010 Elections, ADOC, Arizona, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona Governor Janet NAPOLITANO, Arizona Governor Napolitano, character, Democrat, Dora Schriro, Dr. Arnold, Elena Kagan, filbuster, fraud, Joeseph Stalin, Kagan, narcisscist, narcissistic, Obama's Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan a Lesbian, re-called, Republican Senators, Seventeenth Amendment, sociopath, sociopathy, Stalin, Stalin-like sociopathy, Supreme Court Nominee, The best judge of future behavior is past behavior
Hey this is a great article. I’m going to email this to my buddies. I stumbled on this while surfing for some freebies, I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.
Im not gonna lie, youve lost me here. I know which you meant well and you clearly know what youre discussing, but I cant say that I get where youre coming from. In the event you want men and women to understand your points, you should think about the other side from the argument, too. Youve got a wealth of knowledge, Ill give you that. But, really frankly, you turned me off with your tone.