Posts Tagged ‘Democrat’

An Open Letter to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

By my estimate in 2006 there were 30 Million illegal Mexican aliens living inside our borders.  Now, however, in 2010 their leaders boast about 40 Million criminal invaders seeking citizenship and demanding amnesty by “adverse possession.”

 

When Phoenix passed Philadelphia becoming the 5th largest metropolitan area in the United States, I knew it was a sham.  How did I know?  Because I took the stats published in our otherwise severely liberal newspaper, The Arizona Republic, and I did the numbers.  Had they not counted the illegal aliens, Phoenix would not be as large.

 

That newspaper claimed that 85% of Mexicans in Phoenix were here illegally.  From the figures available, in 2006 I estimated there were more than 1,000,000 illegal Mexican nationals in the Greater Phoenix Metropolitan Area!

 

Then, the bottom started falling out of our economy and the rats started leaving in droves, abandoning ship because they were only here for the jobs and the entitlements we lavish upon them.  Almost overnight the streets around Phoenix experienced reduced traffic and we could drive freely most of the day.  When the illegal’s were here en masse, it was “rush hour” all day long, but once they started going home, we could drive freely again between rush hours.  Now, I estimate there are approximately 500,000 illegal Mexican nationals remaining in Phoenix.

 

Now is the time for the Governor of Arizona to step up and make it State Law that all law enforcement agents shall first confirm the legal status of all persons they come in contact with before they proceed with any other business.  This completely eliminates any (false) claims of “racial profiling” because we are doing it to all, to everyone.

 

Then the State of Arizona needs to make it a crime punishable by fine and imprisonment to hire an illegal alien.  It shall be a misdemeanor to employ an illegal alien and it shall be a felony to knowingly employ an illegal alien.

 

Governor Jan Brewer took a courageous step in signing into Arizona State law a mirror image of the Federal law.  It was an ingenuous leap.  I applaud Jan Brewer for her courage and fortitude.  And at least her detractors have used a flattering photo of her in their “Nazi” posters.

 

Nevertheless, Govern Brewer’s biggest failing(s) was not taking her complaints to the citizens of Arizona when she saw how badly the former governor, Janet Napolitano had mismanaged the State and the illegal manner in which Napolitano cooked the books and violated the law fiscal ruining Arizona.  It would have saved US a lot of trouble not to have Napolitano’s incompetency in DC.  Perhaps it’s not too late.

 

Governor Brewer,  Are you listening?

An Open Letter to Joe Sestak (To Inform the Public–YOU!)

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Hey Joe–

Either you fooled the people before the primary or you are trying to fool the people after the primary.  Which is it, Joe?

You can’t have it both ways: Either you lied & misrepresented Obama’s offer (aka bribe) which means the President interfered with an open election in violation of our criminal code.  Admittedly, it is merely a misdemeanor but it is still a crime.

Or you realize that the only way you can get elected this November is if you have the backing of your party and protect your Demoncratic President–by lying now after winning the Democrat Primary in Pennsylvania  for the US Senate.

I think it’s the latter: You are now trying to play the American public for fools in order to protect the Obama Administration so that you might have a hope of getting elected to the Senate.

It would be an excellent ploy IF you could pull it off!

But you will lose in November.  That’s just my opinion.

Lying sack of shit politician!

“Joe Public,” what’s yours?

Open for comments.

Dr. James David Manning

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

Is this guy for real?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cELPfyeRhVA

Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan a Lesbian?

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

In my opinion, President Obama’s recent Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian.

Likewise, Secretary of Homeland Security and former Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano is most definitely a practicing lesbian who is in a long-term relationship with her former cabinet level appointee, the former Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections Dora Schriro.  However, Schriro may be bi-sexual.

But, not Elena Kagan.  After all my years of experience as a psychologist (retired due to the harassment of Napolitano’s hacks on the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners) in my opinion Kagan is a pure lesbian.

Far more importantly, in my opinion, Elena Kagan is NOT qualified to be appointed to the United States Supreme Court!  In fact, I do not think Kagan should be a judge in ANY court.  However, I would not be averse to some jurisdiction appointing Ms. Kagan to preside over some Small Claims Court occasionally on a substitute basis so that Ms. Elena Kagan, Esquire might get relevant experience and so that we might see how she might perform.

Being a lesbian, in my opinion, does not necessarily disqualify a woman from being in public service; nonetheless, failing to acknowledge one’s sexuality IS a reason to disqualify a woman from public office, especially when that woman appoints her lesbian lover to a sensitive position underneath her such as a cabinet level appointee.  That would be evidence of boundary issues and very poor judgement.

Should the REPUBLICAN SENATORS FAIL TO FILIBUSTER AND DENY PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SECOND SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, that will be evidence that there is no Republican Party and the situation for our country is HOPELESS.

Think of the working environment that would create to appoint this unqualified person to the United States Supreme Court:  It would be a nightmare for the truly qualified justices and we may lose them due to the hostile environment Kagan would push upon them!  We need to make sure that only well-qualified judges with experience are appointed to the Supreme Court least we risk alienating those Honorable Justices already serving!

Furthermore, it is in President Obama’s best interest* that this unqualified liberal who has already demonstrated her willingness to wrongly use her position to push her radial political agenda is not confirmed by the US Senate.  Kagan did it at Harvard and she will do it on the Supreme Court if she is appointed.

The best judge of future behavior is past behavior.

If we had a Constitutional Legislature, this would not happen.  In fact, had our Senate the structure originally written by our founders, it would never happen.  In my opinion, the Seventeenth Amendment is unconstitutional and would not survive a Supreme Court challenge.  It would be thrown out!

Any sitting REPUBLICAN SENATOR who fails to take an active role in the filibuster to block Kagan’s appointment needs to be recalled and needs to be unseated by any means at the earliest opportunity–especially those up for re-election this year 2010 and thereafter.

*Obama is too narcissistic to realize this.  But, then, Stalin-like sociopathy overrules everything about the man.

“You mean we haven’t heard the last of this yet?!” Maxine McCarthy, Former Executive Director Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners August 15, 2006

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

  Here’s the original PDF for the converted and cut & pasted  document below:  <right click>  and  <save target as>  to download

2008-05-10-complaint-orig

Stay tuned to Dr Kent’s Blog and tell everyone you know.

There is indeed a lot more to this story!

May 10, 2008

Sonja Bolf, Executive Director

Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners 1400 West Washington, Room 235

Phoenix, AZ 85007

Via CERTIFIED U.S. MAIL

-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED‑

Re:                                                         Request for Investigation: Susanne Arnold, Ph.D.

Negligence and Neglect Leading to Unnecessary Loss of Lives and Other.

Dear Executive Director Sonja Bolf:

Attached is my completed formal Request for Investigation form. In 2005, I attempted to work closely with the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiner’s Investigator David S. Shapiro; however, rather than work with me on very serious concerns, Mr. Shapiro made some sort of report to the Board indicating that I was perhaps mentally unstable. Mr. Shapiro’s report, whatever it was, was cited by a Board member along with Dr. McCauley’s written response to the Board in a motion ordering me to undergo scrutiny at my expense. That was my second RFI generated internally by this Board.

Allow me to give you some history: After introducing myself to Mr. Shapiro in person at the Board’s office, I expressed my concerns over my duty to report to the Board in light of the overwhelming number of violations of our Rules & Regulations and Arizona Revised Statutes I observed. I asked Mr. Shapiro for advice on how I should handle these matters, and after discussing multiple concerns, Investigator Shapiro told me he thought I could not bring all of those matters to the attention of his Board. More importantly, Mr. Shapiro asked me to bring this complaint regarding the loss of life to the Board.

At that time, I was working within the Arizona Department of Corrections with other professional staff attempting to obtain identifying information regarding the victim(s). Nonetheless, due to the manner in which records are kept in ADOC, after a lot of time and effort, we were not able to obtain the information necessary to come forward with a pressing case. Notwithstanding, we knew several important things. Let me explain Dr. Susanne Arnold’s role in all of this:

Dr. Arnold hired a man who was not qualified to provide professional psychiatric services for ADOC. Dr. Arnold failed to check this applicant’s credentials. I believe, David Rupley, Jr., MD(H) worked at the Arizona State Prison Complexes in Florence and Eyman and other locations in ADOC providing psychiatric services.

Dr. Arnold knowingly signed off on this man’s hours even though she knew they were fraudulent. That is, he had not worked them and she allowed him to defraud the State of significant sums of money. This is why they retaliated against me and sought to destroy me by conspiring to bring false allegations of sexual harassment against me. See attachments. There is more, far more to the story.

Dr. Arnold refused to take necessary action to correct this man’s practice in psychiatry. Specifically, Dr. Arnold failed to correct Dr. Rupley in his failure to monitor the psychiatric medications he was prescribing. More specifically, for more than an entire year, she failed to require Rupley to follow the standard of care of the community, through Arizona and across the entire country. That is, some of these psychiatric medications have Black Box Warnings regarding the necessity to check liver profiles in order to avoid death by agranular cytosis, i.e. Depakote.

Moreover, I have reason to believe that Dr. Arnold knew about several unnecessary inmate deaths. All due to medication errors. All committed by Dr. Rupley between 2002 and 2003. YET, Dr. Arnold allowed Dr. Rupley to continue working at ADOC for at least another full year unimpeded and uncorrected! And Dr. Rupley in all likelihood was allowed to kill more men! Dr. Arnold enabled this horrible malpractice by David Rupley, Jr., MD(H)!

I also brought this to the attention of the Board’s next investigator. When she and I talked on the telephone, she became upset and yelled at me. She told me this Board was ill equipped to handle those matters. Moreover, she told me there were other agencies to which I should make my reports. I have followed her advice to no avail—other than to get myself targeted for more harassment from this Board.

Lastly, when I was notified of a fifth complaint against me before this Board (submitted by the former Director or Programs for ADOC who, by the way, resigned in lieu of termination for having committed real sexual harassment [quid pro quo]); I called the Board’s former Executive Director Mrs. Maxine McCarthy. I wanted to inquire as to the nature of the matter brought to the Board’s attention as no information was forthcoming other than an invitation to the Board’s hearing on August 18, 2006.

When I called Maxine McCarthy on approximately August 15, 2006, I was still reeling and recovering from my chemical ordeal subsequent to the improper discontinuation (under physician’s orders) of bromocriptine on March 30, 2006. In that condition, I was defenseless. Executive Director Maxine McCarthy tried to take me into her confidence. She asked me what was going on: “What’s going on? What’s been going on? You can tell me anything. It’s not going any further.”

While I was in bad shape, I still recognized that whatever I told her would be going further. I acted somewhat impulsively and I told her truthfully and candidly what was behind the efforts to retaliate against me. I told Mrs. McCarthy that there had been an unlicensed psychiatrist at ADOC. He killed several inmates with his medications, and they were trying to hide the deaths.

To which, McCarthy exclaimed and demanded: “You mean we haven’t heard the last of this yet?”

Straight forward,



Completed 2-page RFI form.

Enclosures (With One Complete Copy):

Personal Notes August 27, 2002, Personal Notes September 24, 2002 Personal Notes October 08, 2002, Personal Notes (b) October 08, 2002, Personal Notes October 24, 2002 (2p), Meeting Notes October 24, 2002 (3p hand written), Personal Notes October 24, 2002, Information Report October 24, 2002, Personal Notes November 26, 2002, Personal Notes January 14, 2003, Personal Notes February 11, 2003, Personal Notes February 24, 2003, Personal Notes February 24, 2003 (2p), Personal Notes March 03, 2003. Personal Notes (2p), Personal Mental Health Staff Meeting Notes 17 August 2004, Personal Notes August 18, 2004 (2p), Personal Notes August 18, 2004, Personal Notes August 31, 2004 (2p), Personal Notes October 26, 2004, Psychiatry Timesheet for “David Rupley Jr., MD” “Locum Tenens M.D,” 10/13 Central Unit Main Gate Sign-In Log Health Unit October 07, 2002, Personal Notes August 17, 2004 Mental Health Staff Meeting ASPC—Florence. Personal Notes November 6, 2004 Reassignment, August 24, 2005 Grievance #05-023 and #05-P-063 to ADOC Director Dora Schriro.

Cc:

Senator Linda Gray, Chairwoman, Public Safety and Human Services Committee Representative Jerry Weiers, Chairman. Natural Resources and Public Safety Committee Senate Senator Carolyn S. Allen, Chairwoman, Health Committee

Representative Bob Stump, Chairman, Health Committee

Senator Jay Tibshraeny

Representative Wade V. Nichols

Representative Stephen B. Yarbrough

Is Attorney General Terry Goddard Hiding a Past Gay Life Style with a “Political Marriage?”

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

That’s what my police officer friend tells me.

Stay tuned for more breaking news on the “perversion” of justice in Arizona

Visit Dr Kent’s Blog often and tell your friends.

Censure Joe Wilson

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

If you’re wondering who “Joe Wilson” is, he is the Congressman who failed to control himself and in an emotional outburst called President Obama a liar during Obama’s recent Congressional address.

We can’t have anyone who tells the truth, 😉

So the House of Representatives has to vote to censure Representative Joe Wilson!

Imagine that:

A politician who actually tells the truth!

A United States Congressman who can’t control himself and blurts out the fact that the President just lied to the American people.*

(*About Illegal Immigration & government health “insurance” reform)

‘Obama One’ Flies Low over Texas

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

obamas-first-low-pass-over-texas

I JUST GOT THIS AND FELT THE NEED TO SHARE THE BELLY LAUGHS, AND I AM STILL LAUGHING.  THAT IN ITSELF IS A SAD TESTAMENT TO THE STATE OF MIND OF OVER HALF OF OUR COUNTRIES FELLOW AMERICAN CITIZENS.  BUT THE SENSE OF LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE/COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST THREAT IS PARAMOUNT.  HOPEFULLY THE 2010 ELECTIONS WILL CURE MOST OF THE ISSUES.
 
MY ONLY QUESTION IS:  I WOULD HAVE EXPECTED MUCH BETTER ACCURACY FROM TEXANS !  I WONDER WHICH STATE WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE?  THE SHIP KIND OF REMIND ME OF THE LONE GOOSE OR DUCK THAT KEEPS FLYING UP AND DOWN THE FIRING LINE AND ALL THE HUNTERS EMPTY THEIR SHELL BOXES.
ENJOY,  db
Thanks “db”
Note:  There is no “Air Force One”
Only “Obama One”

Now ‘all Guns’ must be listed on your next (2010) tax return!

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

As if we didn’t have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope it isn’t registered!
 
Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun.
 
This bill was introduced on Feb.. 24, 2009, by the Omama staff. BUT.. this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective ! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all. Trust Obama ? ….. you must be kidding!
 
The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage, U.S. Senate <
http://www.senate.gov/> You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099.

You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know and Record of Sale Act of 2009 – U.S…. Open Congress <http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text>
 
Obama’s Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply.
 
It has begun . . . Whatever Obama’s secret Master Plan is….this is just the ‘tip of the iceburg!’
 
Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.

Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a ‘minor’ IRS revision, and, as usual, the ‘political’ lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!
 
To find out about this – go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.
 
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
 
-It is registered -You are fingerprinted -You supply a current Driver’s License -You supply your Social Security # -You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing -Each update – change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25 – Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail. -There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. -They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.
 
If you think this is a joke – go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family pass this along.
 
This is just a “termite” approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense – chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.

This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.. <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45> :
 
U.S. Congress Open Congress <http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show>
 
(GovTrack.us) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45

We all should have the right to choose.

Anti-gun Health Draft Includes Annual Fines Up To $3800

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

 

Baucus Health Care Draft to Fine Reluctant Gun Owners up to $3,800

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Thursday, September 10, 2009

By now, members of Gun Owners of America should have received pre-written postcards opposing the anti-gun health care bills that are floating around on Capitol Hill. 

Please send in those postcards — as it’s very important for legislative offices to see mounds of gun owners’ mail being dumped on their desks!

Now that Congress is back in session — and the President has given his televised push on health care — it is time for us to redouble our efforts.

To review the bidding:

Every major health care bill being considered in Congress would require many (if not most) Americans to be covered by insurance policies written by the Obama administration — so-called ObamaCare.

Among other things, ObamaCare will almost certainly require, by regulation, that all gun-related medical data be fed into a federal health database — pursuant to a $20 billion program Obama insisted be included in the $787 billion stimulus bill.

So, as a gun owner who doesn’t want this data to be trolled by the BATFE from a federal database, you might say:

* “I’m not going to buy an ObamaCare policy.”

or

* “I’m going to buy the type of insurance that I want to buy.”

Well, anti-gun Democrat Max Baucus (D-MT) has a question for you:  “How would you like to pay a $3,800 a year fine?”

That’s right.  In a legislative draft released this week, Baucus would fine you up to $3,800 for not buying precisely the insurance policy which Barack Obama orders you to buy.

So, what’s going to be required under ObamaCare?  And how much is it going to cost?

Baucus isn’t going to tell you that until after the bill is passed.  We do know that, under the Baucus draft, a lower middle income family could be forced to pay up to 13% of its income to buy an ObamaCare policy. And, presumably, a middle income family would be required to spend much, much more.

Take into consideration that the Baucus draft — with its $3,800 per year fines and its ObamaCare -related gun databases — is the so-called “conservative” bill.  This is the one that they’re trying to get Republicans to sign onto because it’s so “conservative.”  The final Pelosi-written conference report will be much, much worse.

Incidentally, Obama opposed forcing Americans to purchase government-approved insurance during the campaign, but guess what?  He lied.

ACTION: 

1. Write your Senators. Ask them to oppose the anti-gun Baucus draft, with its requirement that Americans purchase an Obama-approved insurance policy or pay a $3,800 annual fine.  This legislative draft has not yet been publicly released; however, several news agencies have reported on its key features — and these reviews are widely available on the Internet. 

You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your legislators the pre-written e-mail message below.

2. Distribute this email far and wide.  There are people that you know who should be involved in the fight against socialized health care who are just sitting on the sidelines.  Please forward this email to them and get them involved in the fight!

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

Please oppose the open-ended anti-gun mandates contained in the Baucus health draft. Among other things, Baucus-mandated policies, which would have to be approved by the Obama administration, will almost certainly require, by regulation, that all gun-related medical data be fed into a federal health database — pursuant to a $20 billion program Obama insisted be included in the $787 billion stimulus bill.

So, what if a gun owner insists on buying the type of insurance he wants to buy? Sen. Baucus would fine him up to $3,800 a year.

That’s right.  In a recently released draft, Baucus would fine gun owners up to $3,800 for not buying precisely the insurance policy which Barack Obama orders them to buy. So, what’s going to be required by this Baucus-mandated policy? And how much is it going to cost?

Baucus isn’t going to tell us that until after the bill is passed. We do know that, under the Baucus draft, a lower middle income family could be forced to pay up to 13% of its income to buy an ObamaCare policy. And, presumably, a middle income family would be required to spend much, much more.

Incidentally, Obama opposed forcing Americans to purchase government-approved insurance during the campaign.

In short, please oppose the anti-gun, anti-freedom Baucus “compromise” and please let me know exactly where you stand on this issue.

Sincerely,


Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will bounce back as undeliverable.

To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to: http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm. Change of e-mail address may also be made at that location.